A little over five years ago, India’s moribund and sometimes distant relations with Japan got a dramatic boost when that country’s visiting prime minister, Shinzo Abe, told India’s Parliament that he looked forward to a “confluence of the two seas” (the Indian and Pacific oceans), and a “broader Asia” that would create “an arc of freedom and prosperity”. Mr Abe declared that Japan had “rediscovered India as a partner that shares the same values and interests”. His strategic vision included Australia and the United States, with which India and Japan launched what was called a “Quadrilateral initiative” that included joint military exercises. The exclusion of China from this “concert of powers” was self-evident, and Beijing protested strongly against the birth of what it called an “Asian Nato”. In the event, Mr Abe was forced by ill-health and political circumstances to step down as prime minister in less than a month of his speech in New Delhi, and the Chinese protests ensured that the Quadrilateral initiative was quietly dropped after Australia developed cold feet.
Five years later, Mr Abe is back as prime minister, having campaigned on a typically nationalistic platform. Japan and China have crossed swords over some uninhabited islands in the East China Sea, and when anti-Japanese feelings have been drummed up on the Chinese mainland. Mr Abe’s response has been to call for a freer role for Japan’s self-defence forces. Economically too, Mr Abe’s strong policy line calls for reflating the Japanese economy so that it manages better growth. It is of course in Mr Abe’s interest to seek a sensible modus vivendi with China, which since 2007 has emerged as an even more powerful system, and a bigger economy than Japan. That should not come in the way of Mr Abe reviving his bid to forge much closer ties with the leading democracies in the region, as forces of stability in a region with rising tensions.
Mr Abe’s India visit resulted in much greater Japanese engagement with India’s development plans, and the financing of major infrastructure development projects.
What is needed now is more direct engagement by Japan’s leading companies, not all of which have been enthusiastic about India. The fact is that Japan and India are, after China, the largest economies in Asia, and the degree of mutual economic engagement should reflect that reality. Yet bilateral trade last year was no more than $12 billion — a small fraction of Sino-Indian trade. Trade with Japan is expected to double in three years, now that the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement has been signed, but it is also true that the tariff cuts envisaged under the agreement will be dragged out over a decade. It is clear that India too needs to get its act together, and become more competitive, in order to expand bilateral ties.
Five years later, Mr Abe is back as prime minister, having campaigned on a typically nationalistic platform. Japan and China have crossed swords over some uninhabited islands in the East China Sea, and when anti-Japanese feelings have been drummed up on the Chinese mainland. Mr Abe’s response has been to call for a freer role for Japan’s self-defence forces. Economically too, Mr Abe’s strong policy line calls for reflating the Japanese economy so that it manages better growth. It is of course in Mr Abe’s interest to seek a sensible modus vivendi with China, which since 2007 has emerged as an even more powerful system, and a bigger economy than Japan. That should not come in the way of Mr Abe reviving his bid to forge much closer ties with the leading democracies in the region, as forces of stability in a region with rising tensions.
Mr Abe’s India visit resulted in much greater Japanese engagement with India’s development plans, and the financing of major infrastructure development projects.
What is needed now is more direct engagement by Japan’s leading companies, not all of which have been enthusiastic about India. The fact is that Japan and India are, after China, the largest economies in Asia, and the degree of mutual economic engagement should reflect that reality. Yet bilateral trade last year was no more than $12 billion — a small fraction of Sino-Indian trade. Trade with Japan is expected to double in three years, now that the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement has been signed, but it is also true that the tariff cuts envisaged under the agreement will be dragged out over a decade. It is clear that India too needs to get its act together, and become more competitive, in order to expand bilateral ties.
He said we should also focus on two-way traffic of inter-polation of ideas with greater and robust trajectory and use the power of ideas for a stable and peaceful world. Japanese Ambassador Takeshi Yagi agreed with the Minister that Japan and India should work for ensuring stability and peace in the India-Pacific as well as the world. Stressing the need for further strengthening the relationship, the Ambassador said he was sure that the bilateral relationship will remain unchanged though the country is going to polls in the next 10 days and a new government will come to power.
The second presentation was made by Professor Janashruti Chandra who spoke on the portrayal of Japan in Indian textbooks as well as the converse portrayal of India in Japanese textbooks. She informed the audience that several references are made not only to Japan’s technological advancements but also to their promotion of humanistic values, aesthetics and literature. Stressing the need for positive portrayals on both sides, she also commented on the shared values that have been preserved in Indian and Japanese society such as respect for elders and courtesy.
The second presentation too was made by Mr. Yamada on behalf of Mr. Teddy Takeuchi, who unfortunately could not attend the seminar. Mr. Takeuchi’s presentation was on the trends of Japanese media on India, where he asserted how Japanese media has noted India’s large scale modernization witnessed by the mushrooming of shopping malls in important urban centres. In India more than 10 Japanese newspapers or agencies maintain an office in New Delhi and Mumbai, however there are no major Indian news corporations, suggesting ’one way traffic’ due to this limited presence.
The final presentation for the day was made by Mr. Anjan Roy, who presented on the changing image of Japan in the Indian business field. Japan had a huge lead in investment into India when it was still a protected economy. Since India’s new economic scenario, the presence of Japanese companies has been extremely pervasive into several different sectors of the Indian economy. He hailed the Japanese commitment to developing India’s infrastructural capacity. Additionally he remarked on the backlash witnessed by Japanese corporations located in China following the Senkaku Islands Conflict. This may be incentive for more Japanese companies to shift their presence to India. He also commented on India as being a hub for manufacturing and exporting Japanese goods to newer markets. Major corporations such as Suzuki, Honda, Toyota, Daiichi-Sanyo, Panasonic and Daikin use India as a base to export to African markets in nations such as Morocco and Nigeria. 






